Letzte Suchanfragen

Ergebnisse für *

Es wurden 1 Ergebnisse gefunden.

Zeige Ergebnisse 1 bis 1 von 1.

Sortieren

  1. The poverty of conceptual truth
    Kant's analytic/synthetic distinction and the limits of metaphysics
    Erschienen: 2015
    Verlag:  Oxford University Press, Oxford

    The poverty of conceptual truth' is based on a simple idea. Kant's distinction between analytic and synthetic judgments underwrites a powerful argument against the metaphysical program of his Leibnizian-Wolffian predecessors-an argument from... mehr

    Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin - Preußischer Kulturbesitz, Haus Potsdamer Straße
    10 A 6781
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe
    Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt / Zentrale
    CF 5017 157
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe
    Universitätsbibliothek Kiel, Zentralbibliothek
    Bw 6589
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe
    Klassik Stiftung Weimar / Herzogin Anna Amalia Bibliothek
    CF 5017 L287
    uneingeschränkte Fernleihe, Kopie und Ausleihe

     

    The poverty of conceptual truth' is based on a simple idea. Kant's distinction between analytic and synthetic judgments underwrites a powerful argument against the metaphysical program of his Leibnizian-Wolffian predecessors-an argument from fundamental limits on its expressive power. In that tradition, metaphysics promised to reveal the deep rational structure of the world through a systematic philosophy consisting of strictly conceptual truths, which flow from a logically perspicuous relation of 'containment' among concepts. That is, all truths would be 'analytic,' in Kant's sense. Kant's distinction shows to the contrary that far reaching and scientifically indispensable parts of our knowledge of the world (including mathematics, the foundations of natural science, all knowledge from experience, and the central principles of metaphysics itself) are essentially synthetic and could never be restated in analytic form. Thus, the metaphysics of Kant's predecessors is doomed, because knowledge crucial to any adequate theory of the world cannot even be expressed in the idiom to which it restricts itself (and which was the basis of its claim to provide a transparently rational account of things). Traditional metaphysics founders on the expressive poverty of conceptual truth. To establish these claims, R. Lanier Anderson shows how Kant's distinction can be given a clear basis within traditional logic, and traces Kant's long, difficult path to discovering it. Once analyticity is framed in clear logical terms, it is possible to reconstruct compelling arguments that elementary mathematics must be synthetic, and then to show how similar considerations about irreducible syntheticity animate Kant's famous arguments against traditional metaphysics in the Critique of Pure Reason

     

    Export in Literaturverwaltung   RIS-Format
      BibTeX-Format
    Hinweise zum Inhalt
    Quelle: Herzogin Anna Amalia Bibliothek
    Beteiligt: Kant, Immanuel
    Sprache: Englisch
    Medientyp: Buch (Monographie)
    Format: Druck
    ISBN: 9780198724575; 9780198801405
    RVK Klassifikation: CF 5017
    Schlagworte: Metaphysics
    Weitere Schlagworte: Kant, Immanuel (1724-1804)
    Umfang: xviii, 408 Seiten, Illustrationen
    Bemerkung(en):

    :