|
Quantifying Expressions in the History of German -- Editorial page -- Title page -- LCC data -- Dedication page -- Table of contents -- Preface -- List of abbreviations -- 1. Introduction -- 1.1 Basic proposal -- 1.2 Corpora, methodology, and definitions -- 1.2.1 Corpora -- 1.2.2 Methodology and definitions -- 1.3 The structure of the DP and case assignment -- 1.3.1 Types of quantifiers -- 1.3.2 The structure of the cardinal and proportional constructions -- 1.3.3 The proportional construction in more detail -- 1.3.4 The internal structure of the dependent -- 1.3.5 The quantifier and dependent form a constituent -- 1.3.6 The direction of case assignment -- 1.4 Organization of the book -- 2. Simplex quantifying word: viel -- 2.1 Introduction -- 2.2 Data for viel by historical period -- 2.2.1 Etymology -- 2.2.2 Old High German -- 2.2.2.1 filu with dependent N -- 2.2.2.2 filu with dependent Adj -- 2.2.2.3 filu with dependent DP -- 2.2.2.4 filu with dependent pronoun -- 2.2.2.5 Inflection on filu -- 2.2.2.6 Modification of filu by a degree adverb -- 2.2.2.7 OHG Summary -- 2.2.3 Middle High German -- 2.2.3.1 vil with dependent N -- 2.2.3.2 vil with dependent Adj (and N) -- 2.2.3.3 vil with dependent DP -- 2.2.3.4 vil with dependent pronoun: -- 2.2.3.5 Inflection on vil -- 2.2.3.6 Modification of vil by a degree adverb -- 2.2.3.7 MHG Summary -- 2.2.4 Early New High German -- 2.2.4.1 viel with dependent N: -- 2.2.4.2 viel with dependent Adj (and N) -- 2.2.4.3 viel with dependent DP -- 2.2.4.4 viel with dependent pronoun -- 2.2.4.5 viel with PPvon -- 2.2.4.6 Inflection on viel -- 2.2.4.7 Modification of viel by a degree adverb -- 2.2.4.8 ENHG Summary -- 2.3 Analysis -- 2.3.1 OHG: A semi-lexical, quantifying N -- 2.3.2 Early MHG: A quantifying particle -- 2.3.3 Later MHG: A quantifying adjective -- 2.3.4 The null quantifier SOME 2.3.5 ENHG: Change of the dependent from genitive to concord -- 2.3.6 Modern German -- 2.3.7 Summary of the developments of viel -- 2.4 Discussion -- 2.4.1 Three types of reanalysis -- 2.4.2 Head-to-spec reanalysis as degrammaticalization -- 2.4.3 Structural size and the loss of genitive -- 3. From lexical adjective to quantifying adjective: wenig -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2 Data for wenig by historical period -- 3.2.1 Etymology -- 3.2.2 Old High German -- 3.2.3 Middle High German -- 3.2.3.1 wenic with dependent N -- 3.2.3.2 wenic with dependent Adj (and N) -- 3.2.3.3 wenic with dependent DP -- 3.2.3.4 wenic with dependent pronoun -- 3.2.3.5 MHG Summary -- 3.2.4 Early New High German -- 3.2.4.1 wenig with dependent N -- 3.2.4.2 wenig with dependent Adj (and N) -- 3.2.4.3 wenig with dependent DP -- 3.2.4.4 wenig with dependent pronoun -- 3.2.4.5 Inflection on and modification of wenig -- 3.2.4.6 ENHG Summary -- 3.3 Analysis -- 3.3.1 OHG: An ordinary adjective -- 3.3.2 MHG: The lexical split into adjective and quantifying particle -- 3.3.3 ENHG: Reanalysis from genitive to concord -- 3.3.4 Modern German -- 3.3.5 On the structure of ein wenig -- 3.4 Discussion -- 4. Universal quantifiers all and jeder -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 Data for all by historical period -- 4.2.1 Etymology -- 4.2.2 Old High German -- 4.2.2.1 al with dependent N -- 4.2.2.2 al with dependent Adj (and N) -- 4.2.2.3 al with dependent DP -- 4.2.2.4 al with dependent pronoun -- 4.2.2.5 Inflection on al -- 4.2.2.6 OHG Summary -- 4.2.3 Middle High German -- 4.2.3.1 al with dependent N -- 4.2.3.2 al with dependent Adj (and N) -- 4.2.3.3 al with dependent DP -- 4.2.3.4 al with dependent pronoun -- 4.2.3.5 MHG Summary -- 4.2.4 Early New High German -- 4.2.4.1 all with dependent N -- 4.2.4.2 all with dependent Adj (and N): -- 4.2.4.3 all with dependent DP -- 4.2.4.4 all with dependent pron 4.2.4.5 Inflection on and modification of all -- 4.2.4.6 ENHG Summary -- 4.3 Analysis of all -- 4.3.1 OHG: Genitive relics -- 4.3.2 OHG: Concord with adjectival al -- 4.3.3 MHG and (early) ENHG: The CardP or OrdP layer -- 4.3.4 (Late) ENHG: Into the DP layer -- 4.3.5 Modern German -- 4.4 Data for jeder by historical period -- 4.4.1 Etymology -- 4.4.2 Old High German -- 4.4.2.1 iowethar with dependent N -- 4.4.2.2 iowethar with dependent pronoun -- 4.4.2.3 Inflection on iowethar and evidence for its complex status -- 4.4.2.4 OHG Summary -- 4.4.3 Middle High German -- 4.4.3.1 ieweder with dependent N -- 4.4.3.2 ieweder with dependent Adj (and N) -- 4.4.3.3 ieweder with dependent DP -- 4.4.3.4 ieweder with dependent pronoun -- 4.4.3.5 Inflection on ieweder and its complex status -- 4.4.3.6 MHG Summary -- 4.4.4 Early New High German -- 4.4.4.1 jeder with dependent N -- 4.4.4.2 jeder with dependent Adj (and N) -- 4.4.4.3 jeder with dependent DP or pronoun -- 4.4.4.4 ENHG Summary -- 4.5 Analysis of jeder -- 4.5.1 OHG: bi-morphemic io+(gi)wethar -- 4.5.2 MHG: Univerbation -- 4.5.3 ENHG: in Spec-CardP or Spec-DP -- 4.5.4 Modern German -- 4.6 Discussion -- 5. Complex indefinite pronouns: jemand, niemand, and nichts -- 5.1 Introduction -- 5.2 Data for jemand, niemand, icht, and nichts by historical period -- 5.2.1 Etymology -- 5.2.2 Old High German -- 5.2.2.1 IndPron with dependent N -- 5.2.2.2 IndPron with dependent Adj -- 5.2.2.3 IndPron with dependent Adj and N -- 5.2.2.4 IndPron with dependent DP -- 5.2.2.5 IndPron with dependent pronoun -- 5.2.2.6 Inflection on ioman, nioman, iowiht, and niowiht, and evidence for their complex status -- 5.2.2.7 Modification of OHG complex pronouns -- 5.2.2.8 OHG Summary -- 5.2.3 Middle High German -- 5.2.3.1 IndPron with dependent N -- 5.2.3.2 IndPron with dependent Adj -- 5.2.3.3 IndPron with dependent Adj and N 5.2.3.4 IndPron with dependent DP -- 5.2.3.5 IndPron with dependent pronoun -- 5.2.3.6 Inflection on ieman, nieman, iht, and niht, and evidence for their complex status -- 5.2.3.7 Modification of complex pronouns -- 5.2.3.8 MHG Summary -- 5.2.4 Early New High German -- 5.2.4.1 IndPron with dependent N -- 5.2.4.2 IndPron with dependent Adj -- 5.2.4.3 IndPron with dependent Adj and N -- 5.2.4.4 IndPron with dependent DP -- 5.2.4.5 IndPron with dependent pronoun -- 5.2.4.6 Inflection on jemand, niemand, icht, and nichts, and evidence for their complex status -- 5.2.4.7 Modification of the complex pronouns -- 5.2.4.8 ENHG Summary -- 5.3 Analysis -- 5.3.1 OHG and MHG: Indefinite pronouns are bi-morphemic -- 5.3.2 Univerbation in ENHG -- 5.3.3 Consequences of univerbation: Splitting the nominal and concord -- 5.3.4 Further consequences of univerbation: Restrictions on the dependent -- 5.3.5 Morphological reanalysis -- 5.3.6 Late ENHG: Indefinite pronouns as complex specifiers -- 5.3.7 Modern German -- 5.4 Discussion -- 6. A different complex indefinite pronoun: etwas -- 6.1 Introduction -- 6.2 Data for etwas by historical period -- 6.2.1 Etymology -- 6.2.2 Old High German -- 6.2.2.1 ettewaz with dependent N -- 6.2.2.2 ettewaz with dependent Adj -- 6.2.2.3 ettewaz with dependent DP or pronoun -- 6.2.2.4 OHG Summary -- 6.2.3 Middle High German -- 6.2.3.1 etwaz with dependent N -- 6.2.3.2 etwaz with dependent Adj -- 6.2.3.3 etwaz with dependent DP -- 6.2.3.4 MHG Summary -- 6.2.4 Early New High German -- 6.2.4.1 etwas with dependent N -- 6.2.4.2 etwas with dependent Adj (and N) -- 6.2.4.3 etwas with dependent DP -- 6.2.4.4 ENHG Summary -- 6.2.5 Inflection on etwas, its complex status, and modification -- 6.3 Analysis -- 6.3.1 OHG/MHG: Bi-morphemic et+waz -- 6.3.2 ENHG: Univerbation and concord with quantificational etwas 6.3.3 Late ENHG: Pronominal (et)was climbs up the tree -- 6.3.4 Modern German: Mono-morphemic and bi-morphemic etwas -- 6.3.5 The null quantifier SOME revisited -- 6.4 Discussion -- 7. Exceptional adjectives -- 7.1 Introduction -- 7.2 Data for ander occurring with a quantifier -- 7.2.1 Etymology -- 7.2.2 Old High German -- 7.2.3 Middle High German -- 7.2.4 Early New High German -- 7.3 Analysis of ander -- 7.3.1 OHG: The Ordinal Phrase (OrdP) -- 7.3.2 MHG: In OrdP or CardP -- 7.3.3 ENHG to Modern German: From OrdP to AgrP -- 7.4 Discussion and extension to solch and folgend -- 8. Conclusions -- 8.1 Comparison of the quantifying words: Our main claims -- 8.2 Some theoretical implications of our main claims -- 8.2.1 Different types of reanalysis -- 8.2.2 More on head-to-spec reanalysis as degrammaticalization -- 8.2.3 Loss of the genitive: Structural size vs. morphological ambiguity -- 8.3 Extensions for future research and open questions -- References -- Index
|
