|
Introduction. Crossing borderlines : beyond the structure of parallel world views / Jens Allwood, Olga Pombo and Giovanni Scarafile -- Controversies in public and private on-line communication / Angelo Corallo, Laura Fortunato, Clara Renna, Marco Lucio Sarcinella, Alessandra Spennato and Cristina De Blasi -- The Paks pact : topoi in Hungarian nuclear energy discourse / Dorottya Egres and Anna Petschner -- Particularist understanding of CSR marketing visual arguments : an applied multidisciplinary approach / Hédi Csordás and Zsolt Ziegler -- Cognitive science and the controversy of anthropogenic climate change / Annette Hohenberger -- ELEna : an interdisciplinary research / Diego Jiménez, José Luis Pro, Francisco José Salguero and José Francisco Quesada -- What is the meaning of biodiversity? A pragmatist approach to an intrinsically interdisciplinary concept / Pierluigi Barrotta and Roberto Gronda -- Human evolution : a role for culture? / Paulo C. Abrantes -- A historical controversy about politeness and public argument : the dispute about fashion between Melchiorre Gioja and Antonio Rosmini / Francesca Saltamacchia and Andrea Rocci -- Husserl's phenomenology of inner time-consciousness and enactivism : the harmonizing argument / Yaron Senderowicz -- Controversial images : 'listening to' the visual, for a new communication ethics / Veronica Neri -- The role and the impact of interdisciplinarity on the relational models of intervention in the doctor-patient communication / Roberto Greco -- The pointer finger and the pilgrim shell : ethics of listening, resistance to change and interdisciplinarity / Giovanni Scarafile -- Science and democracy : a complex relationship / Olga Pombo. "Nowadays, the forms assumed by knowledge indicate an unhinging of traditional structures conceived on the model of discipline. Consequently, what was once strictly disciplinary becomes interdisciplinary, what was homogeneous becomes heterogeneous and what was hierarchical becomes heterarchical. When we look for a matrix of interdisciplinarity, that is to say, a primary basis or an essential dimension of all the complex phenomena we are surrounded by, we see the need to break with the disciplinary self-restraint in which, often completely inadvertently, many of us lock ourselves up, remaining anchored to our own competences, ignoring what goes beyond our own sphere of reference. However, interdisciplinarity is still a vague concept and a much demanding practice. It presupposes the continuous search for convergent theoretical perspectives and methodologies, and the definition of common spaces and languages, as well as a true dialogical and open mind of several scholars. From ethics to science, from communication to medicine, from climate change to human evolution the volume Controversies and Interdisciplinarity offers a series of original insights beyond disciplinary fragmentation for a new knowledge model"--
|
