Letzte Suchanfragen
Ergebnisse für *
Es wurden 110 Ergebnisse gefunden.
Zeige Ergebnisse 1 bis 25 von 110.
Sortieren
-
A list of the nominees appointed by the Lords Commissioners of His Majesty's treasury
To hold shares on the part of the public in the tontine of the year 1789: in pursuance of an act of Parliament, made and passed in the thirtieth year of the reign of Our Most Gracious Sovereign King George the Third, intituled, "An act for converting certain annuities, to be "attended with the benefit of survivorship, in classes, "established by an act of the last session of Parliament, into "certain annuities for an absolute term of years; and for "enabling the commissioners of the treasury to nominate lives "for the shares so converted." -
No. 6. Return to the sixth order of the Honourable House of Commons, dated 9th February 1792. Ordered to be printed 16th February 1792
-
The twelfth report of the commissioners appointed to enquire into the state and condition of the woods, forests, and land revenues of the crown, and to sell or alienate fee farm and other unimproveable rents. dated 25th May 1792. Ordered to be printed 1st June 1792
-
Before the Most Noble and Right Honourable the Lords Commissioners of Appeals in Prize Causes. Count de Belgiosio. Gerrit Borst, master. Bartholomew Songa, of Warnford-Court, Throgmorton-Street, London, merchant, the claimant of the said ship, her tackle, apparel, and furniture, and all and singular the goods, wares, and merchandizes laden therein, as neutral property, appellant. And Pieter de Cuyper, of the city of Ostend, merchant, Pieter Boeye, of Saint Nicholas, in the county of Waes, in Flanders, merchant, Henry Gistain Vander Sare, Esquire, also of Saint Nicholas, hereditary treasurer and receiver general of the said county of Waes, Johannes Baptistus Ludovicus Vermessen, also of Saint Nicholas, Ferdinand Emanuel de Cauwer, late of Saint Nicholas aforesaid, now deceased, whilst living one of the magistrates of the lordship of Waes, aforesaid, and Johannes Francisus Van Hulle, of Somergen, and registrar of Vanderboute, in Flanders, respectively subjects of His Royal Apostolick Majesty, the emperor of Germany, and respectively part owners of the said ship, and the said Pieter Boeye, as being the sole owner of the cargo laden therein, parties intervening for their several interests in this cause, interveuors. Against John Casey, commander of the private ship of war the Juno, the captor of the said ship and her cargo, respondent. Further case on behalf of the appellant and intervenors
-
Before the Most Noble and Right Honourable the Lords Commissioners of Appeals in Prize Causes. The Rachael Mobareck, otherwise Tatty Mumbarick, Jose Pereira de Souza, master. The Right Honorable William Murray, commonly called Lord William Murray the claimant, as agent for and on behalf of Ephraim Cohen, of the city of Cochin, in the dominions of the Rajah of Old Cochin, and a subject of the said king or rajah, the real, true, lawful, and sole owner and proprietor of the said ship, her Tackle, apparel and furniture, and of the several goods, wares and merchandizes herein after mentioned, laden and on board the said ship at the time of the capture and seizure thereof, in the month of July, 1781, in the Road of Cudalore, in the East Indies, by a party of scapoys, or seamen, under the command of the RIght Honorable Vice-Admiral Sir Edward Hughes, knight of the Most Honorable order of the Bath, commander in chief of a squadron of His Majesty's Ships and vessels in the East Indies, appellant. Against the said Vice-Admiral Sir Edward Hughes, and James Heseltine, Esquire, His Majesty's procurator-General, respondents. An appeal from the High Court of Admiralty of England. The appellant's case
An appeal from the High Court of Admiralty of England. The appellant's case -
Before the Most Noble and Right Honourable the Lords Commissioners of Appeals in Prize Causes. Appeal from the High Court of Admiralty of England. The Rachael Mobareck, otherwise Tatty Mumbarick, Jose Pereira de Souza, master. The Right Honourable William Murray, commonly called Lord William Murray, the claimant, as agent for and on behalf of Ephraim Cohen, of the city of Cochin, in the dominions of the Rajah of Old Cochin, and a subject of the said King or Rajah, the real, true, lawful, and sole owner and proprietor of the said ship, her tackle, apparel, and furniture, and of the several goods, wares and merchandizes hereinafter mentioned, laden and on board the said ship at the time of the capture and seizure thereof, in the month of July 1781, in the road of Cudalore, in the East Indies, by a party of seapoys, or seamen, under the command of the Right Honourable Vice-Admiral Sir Edward Hughes, Knight of the Most Honourable order of the Bath, commander in chief of a squadron of His Majesty's ships and vessels in teh East Indies, - - - - - - appellant. Against the said Vice-Admiral Sir Edward Hughes, and James Heseltine, Esquire, His Majesty's procurator-general - respondents, Appendix to the appellant's case
-
[Before] the Most Noble and Right Honourable the Lords Commissioners of Appeals in Prize Causes. The Rachael Mobareck, otherwise Tatty Mumbarick, Joze Pereira de Souza, master. Additional appendix to the appellant's case
-
Before the Most Noble and Right Honourable the Lords Commissioners of Appeals in Prize Causes. Appeal from the High Court of Admiralty of England. The Fatty Mambruck, otherwise Rachael Mowbarick, the Right Honourable William Murray, commonly called Lord William Murray, the claimant of the said ship and part of her cargo, as the true, lawful, and sole property of Emphraim Cohen, of Old Cochin on the coast of Malabar in the East Indies, appellant. Against Sir Edward Hughes, Knight of the Most Honourable order of the Bath, late commander in chief of a squadron of His Majesty's ships in the East Indies, his officers and others composing the said squadron, the captors of the said ship and goods, respondents. The respondents' case
-
Before the Most Noble and Right Honourable the Lords Commissioners of Appeals in Prize Causes. Appeal from the High Court of Admiralty of England. The Fatty Mombruick, otherwise Rachael Mowbarick. The Right Honourable William Murray, commonly called Lord William Murray, the claimant of the said ship and part of her cargo, as the true, lawful, and sole property of Ephraim Cohen, of Old Cochin on the coast of Malabar, appellant. Against Sir Edward Hughes, Knight of the Most Honourable order of the Bath, late commander in chief of a squadron of His Majesty's ships in the East Indies, his officers and others composing the said squadron, the captors of the said ship and goods, respondents. Appendix to the respondents' case
-
[Befo]re the Most Noble and Right Honourable the Lords Commissioners of Appeals in Prize Causes. Appeal from the High Court of Admiralty of England. The Fatty Mambruck, otherwise Rachael Mowbarick. Further appendix to the respondents' case
-
Before the Most Noble and Right Honourable the Lords Commissioners of Appeals in Prize Causes. Chinsurah and its dependencies. An appeal from the High Court of Admiralty. On appeal of Thomas Morton Esquire. The said Thomas Morton Esq. syndic of the United Company of Merchants of England, trading to the East Indies, - - - - appellant. Against Vice Admiral Sir Edward Hughes, Knight of the Bath, late commander in chief of a squadron of His Majesty's ships and vessels in the East Indies, the officers and crews of His Majesty's sloop Nymph, one of the said squadron, pretended captors of all and singular the treasure, goods, wares, merchandizes, and essects, taken and seized at Chinsurah, and James Heseltine Esq. procurator-general of Our Sovereign Lord the King, - respondents. Appeal of Sir Edward Hughes. The said Vice Admiral Sir Edward Hughes, and the officers and crew of said sloop Nymph, and the said James Heseltine Esq. - - appellants. Against the said Thomas Morton Esq. syndic of the said East India Company, - - - respondent. Case on behalf Thomas Morton, Esq
-
Before the Most Noble and Right Honourable the Lords Commissioners of Appeals in Prize Causes. Chinsurah, and its dependencies. An appeal from the High Court of Admiralty of England, on behalf of Thomas Morton, Esq.The said Thomas Morton, Esq. syndic of the United Company of Merchants of England trading to the East Indies, - - - - appellants; against Vice-Admiral Sir Edward Hughes, Knight of the Bath, late commander in chief of a squadron of His Majesty's ships and vessels in the East Indies; the officers and crew of His Majesty's sloop of war the Nymph, one of the said squadron, pretended captors of all and singular the treasure, goods, wares, merchandizes, and effects, taken and seized at Chinsurah; and James Heseltine, Esq. Procurator-General for Our Sovereign Lord the King, - - - respondents. Appeal on behalf of Sir Edward Hughes, and others. The said Sir Edward Hughes, and the officers and crew of His Majesty's said sloop of war the Nymph, and the said James Heseltine, Esquire, - appellants, against the said Thomas Morton, Esquire, syndic of the said United Company, - - - respondents. Appendix to the case on behalf of Thomas Morton, Esq
-
Before the Most Noble and Right Honourable the Lords Commissioners of Appeals in Prize Causes. Chinsurah, and its dependencies. Appeal from the High Court of Admiralty of England, on behalf of Thomas Morton, Esq. The said Thomas Morton, Esq. syndic of the United Company of Merchants of England, trading to the East Indies, - - - - - appellant, against Sir Edward Hughes, Knight of the Most Honourable order of the Bath, late commanders in chief of His Majesty's squadron in the East-Indies, and the officers and crew of His Majesty's sloop of war the Nymph, one of the said squadron, and James Heseltine, Esq. His Majesty's procurator-general, - - - - - respondents appeal on the behalf of Sir Edward Hughes. The said Sir Edward Hughes, and the officers and crew of His Majesty's sloop of war the Nymph, - appellants, against the said Thomas Morton, Esq. syndic of the said United Company of Merchants of England, trading to the East-Indies, - - - - respondent. Case on behalf of Sir Edward Hughes, and the officers and crew of His Majesty's sloop of war the Nymph
-
Before the Most Noble and Right Honourable the Lords Commissioners of Appeals in Prize Causes. Chinsurah, and its dependencies. An appeal from the High Court of Admiralty of England, on behalf of Thomas Morton, Esq. The said Thomas Morton, Esq. syndic of the United Company of merchants of England trading to the East Indies, - - - - appellants; against Vice-Admiral Sir Edward Hughes, Knight of the Bath, late commander in chief of a squadron of His Majesty's ships and vessels in the East Indies; the officers and crew of His Majesty's sloop of war the Nymph, one of the said squadron, pretended captors of all and singular the treasure, goods, wares, merchandizes, and effects, taken and seized at Chinsurah; and James Heseltine, Esq. procurator-general for Our Sovereign Lord the King, - - - respondents. Appeal on behalf of Sir Edward Hughes, and others. The said Sir Edward Hughes, and the officers and crew of His Majesty's said sloop of war the Nymph, and the said James Heseltine, Esquire, appellants, against the said Thomas Morton, Esquire, syndic of the said United Company, - - - respondents. Appendix to the case on behalf of Sir Edward Hughes, and others
-
Before the Most Noble and Right Honourable the Lords Commissioners of Appeals in Prize Causes. Saint Eustatius and its dependencies. Claim, No. 19, of Richard Puller. Richard Puller, of new broad street buildings, London, merchant, - - claimant and appellant. Against Sir George Bridges (now Lord) Rodney, and the Honourable Lieutenant General John Vaughan, the commanders of His Majesty's sea and land forces on an expedition to the Island of Saint Eustatius, - - - captors and respondents Case on behalf of the claimant and appellant, in objection to the register's report
-
Before the Most Noble and Right Honourable the Lords Commissioners of Appeals in Prize Causes. St. Eustatius, and its dependencies. No. 19, claim of Richard Puller. Case on behalf of the captors, in objection to the register's report
-
Before the Most Noble and Right Honourable the Lords Commissioners of Appeals in Prize Causes. St. Eustatius, and its dependencies. No. 19. Claim of Richard Puller. Case on behalf of the captors, on objections of the claimant to the registrar's further report
-
The debates in both Houses of Parliament, on Thursday the 13th, Friday the 14th, and Saturday, the 15th December, 1792, on the King's speech
Containing a copious and impartial account of the present state of Great Britain, and its relative interests respecting foreign powers, as delineated in the speaches of the most distinguished members of each House, in which are fully discussed the probable consequences of a war with France, the disturbances in Scotland and Ireland, and the alledged insurrection in this Kingdom. To which is added an accurate list of the members who divided with Mr. Fox -
Copies of letters from the Late Sir Archibald Campbell to the Rajah of Travancore; dated 5th, 17th, and 30th April, and 12th August, 1788
-
Copy of a letter from the Late Sir Archibald Campbell to Brigade Major Bannerman, dated 12th August 1788
-
An act for dividing, alloting, and inclosing the commons and waste grounds, within the town or hamlet of March, in the manor and parish of Doddington, in the isle of Ely, and county of Cambridge; and for altering and amending an act, passed in the thirtieth year of the reign of His Late Majesty King George the Second, for draining and preserving certain fen lands, low grounds, and commons, in the townships or hamlets of March and Wimblington, and in the parish of Upwell, in the isle of Ely, and county of Cambridge
-
The eighth report of the Commissioners appointed to enquire into the state and condition of the woods, forests, and land revenues of the Crown, and to sell or alienate fee farm and other unimproveable rents. Dated 12th June 1791, and 6th February 1792
-
The ninth report of the Commissioners appointed to enquire into the state and condition of the woods, forests, and land revenues of the Crown, and to sell or alienate fee farm and other unimproveable rents. Dated 6th February 1792
-
The tenth report of the commissioners appointed to enquire into the state and condition of the woods, forests, and land revenues of the crown
And to sell or alienate fee farm and other unimproveable rents. Dated 6th February 1792 -
The eleventh report of the Commissioners appointed to enquire into the state and condition of the woods, forests, and land revenues of the Crown, and to sell or alienate fee farm and other unimproveable rents. Dated 6th February 1792